Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93847 (PNJ)

TALIM HUSSAIN v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/49724/2024 · 2025-05-20

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 206-2 TALIM HUSSAIN STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present : Mr. Ms. Sheenu Sura, D.A.G., Haryana. MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) 1. Prayer in this petition, filed is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.46 dated 18.02.2024 186, 307, 506, 120 Gauvansh Sanrakshan and Gaus of Damage to Public Property 2. Vide order dated granted interim bail and was directed to join investigation. 3. Status report has already been filed. 4. Learned State counsel, on instructions from the Inve has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation on 04.01.2025 and he is not required for custodial interrogation. 5. Keeping in view the above mentioned facts and circumstances, without commenting on the merits of the case dated 03.10.2024 compliance of usual terms and conditions requisite for grant of anticipatory bail. 20.05.2025 Jyoti-IV IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: TALIM HUSSAIN Versus STATE OF HARYANA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Arjun Attri, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sheenu Sura, D.A.G., Haryana. **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) Prayer in this petition, filed is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.46 dated 18.02.2024 registered under 279, 332, 336,353, 186, 307, 506, 120-B, 395 and 397 of IPC and Sections 5 and 13(3) of Harya Gauvansh Sanrakshan and Gausamvardhan Act, 2015 and Section 3(2) of P of Damage to Public Property Act,1984, at Police Station Sadar Vide order dated 03.10..2024, passed by this Court, the petitioner was granted interim bail and was directed to join investigation. Status report has already been filed. Learned State counsel, on instructions from the Inve has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation on 04.01.2025 and he is not required for custodial interrogation. Keeping in view the above mentioned facts and circumstances, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order 3.10.2024, granting interim bail to the petitioner, is made absolute, compliance of usual terms and conditions requisite for grant of anticipatory bail. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA No.49724 of 2024 Date of decision: 20.05.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondent HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioner. Prayer in this petition, filed is for grant of anticipatory bail to the registered under 279, 332, 336,353, B, 395 and 397 of IPC and Sections 5 and 13(3) of Haryana amvardhan Act, 2015 and Section 3(2) of Prevention at Police Station Sadar Nuh, District Nuh. .2024, passed by this Court, the petitioner was granted interim bail and was directed to join investigation. Learned State counsel, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation on 04.01.2025 and he is not Keeping in view the above mentioned facts and circumstances, without , the present petition is allowed and the order , granting interim bail to the petitioner, is made absolute, subject to compliance of usual terms and conditions requisite for grant of anticipatory bail. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No Prayer in this petition, filed is for grant of anticipatory bail to the registered under 279, 332, 336,353, na revention .2024, passed by this Court, the petitioner was stigating Officer, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation on 04.01.2025 and he is not Keeping in view the above mentioned facts and circumstances, without , the present petition is allowed and the order subject to Jyoti 2025.05.21 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document