Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93846 (ALL)

JAWAHAR v. RAMESH

A227/11081/2025 · 2025-09-16

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11081 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to direct the Civil Judge (J.D.), Basgaon, Gorakhpur to decide the Suit N. 438 of 2018 (Ramesh Vs. Sonmati and others) within stipulated and reasonable period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court otherwise petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the application for temporary injunction is pending consideration since 2018 and the same has not been decided till date. Learned counsel prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. Since the above-mentioned application is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Basgaon, Gorakhpur to decide the application for temporary injunction, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. September 17, 2025 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Jawahar .....Petitioner(s) Ramesh .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad