SOBHNATH ARYA AND 6 OTHERS v. UNION OF INDIA AND 17 OTHERS
WRIA/14894/2024 · 2025-01-16
Neeraj Tiwari
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93839 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93839 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:7364 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 14894 of 2024 Petitioner :- Sobhnath Arya And 6 Others Respondent :- Union Of India And 17 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Prashant Singh Som Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and Mr. Prashant Singh,
learned counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties for grant of notional increment due to petitioners on 1st July of respective year since they had superannuated on 30th June of that very year. Further prayer for re-fixation of basic pay of petitioners after grant of notional increment and revision of pensionary benefits has also been sought.
3. It has been submitted that petitioners' case is fully covered by
judgment rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the cases of The Director (Admn. and HR) KPTCL & Ors. versus C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. reported in 2023 Live Law (SC) 296 & Union of India & Anr. versus M. Siddaraj passed in Civil Appeal No. of 2023 @ Special Leave Petition (C) No.4722 of
2021.
4. For the aforesaid grievance, petitioners have already submitted representation but seeks liberty to file a fresh individual representations before concerned authority which it is submitted that may be directed to be decided.
5. Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for petitioners and without entering into the merits of the case petitioners are granted liberty to file a fresh individual representation before opposite party No.2 i.e. Executive Director, Pay Commission, Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi. In case such a representations are filed, the same shall be considered and decided in the light of judgment rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the cases of The Director (Admn. and HR) KPTCL & Ors. versus C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. reported in 2023 Live Law (SC) 296 & Union of India & Anr. versus M.
Siddaraj passed in Civil Appeal No. of 2023 @ Special Leave Petition (C) No.4722 of 2021 in case the same are applicable.
6. The decision with regard to same shall be taken within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
7. With the aforesaid observation, petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 16.1.2025 Sartaj Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad