HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7511 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard counsel for the applicants as well as Shashank Shekhar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.304 of 2024, under section 147, 323, 352, 307 I.P.C., P.S. Nai Mandi, District Muzaffarnagar. 3. Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant no.1 is the daughter-in-law of the informant. The applicant no.2 is the close relative of the applicant no.1. In the alleged incident, the informant has not received any injury. No medical report is available in the case diary. The alleged video footage does not connect the applicant with the offence. The investigation has been completed. The applicants had cooperated in the investigation. No custodial interrogation is required. The applicants have been summoned by the concerned Court. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. The applicants have apprehension of their arrest in the above mentioned case. In case, the applicants are granted anticipatory bail, they will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicants and the fact that in the alleged Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kanhaiya Mishra, Sandeep Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Himanshi And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) incident, the informant has not received any injury, no medical report is available in the case diary, the alleged video footage does not connect the applicant with the offence, the fact that the applicants had cooperated in the investigation and no custodial interrogation is required, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicants are entitled for anticipatory bail till conclusion of trial. 6. In the event of arrest, the applicants Himanshi and Anju Singhal, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants shall make themselves available on each and every date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; (ii) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court; (iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passport, the same shall be deposited by them before the concerned court. 7. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 8. The application stands disposed of. September 15, 2025 S.S. NABAIL No. 7511 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad