APHC010104152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 75/2025 Between: 1. SMT. YASARAPU DURGA DEVI, W/O. Y. SIVA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS. HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT 50-10-12, SRIHARI VEEDHI, OPPOSITE GVK PLAZA, SEETHAMPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. YASARAPU SIVA, S/O. Y. RAMUDU (LATE), HINDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. WORKING AS A TEACHER, RESIDING AT 17-1-79, H/O. MEESALA VENKATA RAO, OPP. DVM SCHOOL, CHURCH ROAD, AGRAHARAM VEEDHI, BELAGAM, PARVATHIPURAM, PARVATHIPURAM MUNICIPALITY, PARVATHIPURAM MANYAM DISTRICT. 2. VEMPADU VENKATA CHANDRA SEKHAR CHANDU, S/O RAMARAO, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS. WORKING IN FISHING COMPANY, R/O 17-1-79, GARIVIDI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition Under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased topleased to transfer the petition in HMOP No 41 of 2022 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Parvathipuram to the file of Hon'ble V Additional District and Sessions Cum Family Judge at Visakhapatnam, IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in Hon’ble court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in HMOP No 41 of 2022 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Parvathipuram. pending disposal of the main petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SARAT BABU PULIPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A RADHAKRISHNA The Court made the following: ORDER: 1. When the matter was listed on the last occasion, i.e., on 06.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, and the matter was posted today, under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. 2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents alone is present. Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not inclined to prosecute the present case. 3. Accordingly, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date.07.08.2025 CVD