Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93825 (PNJ)

BIRBAL SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/46335/2025 · 2025-08-26

Surya Partap Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 124 BIRBAL SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PRATAP SINGH Suraksha Sanhita order dated Magistrate order, the proclamation, issued against the he was declared proclaimed person. on behalf of the respondent present petition with dispose of the bail application, to be filed by the petitioner. -46335-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH BIRBAL SINGH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH Mr. Shiv K. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Section 528 of Bha Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’) order dated 07.07.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned Magistrate, Sangrur (hereinafter referred to as ‘ the proclamation, issued against the he was declared proclaimed person. Notice of motion to respondent No.1 only. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab on behalf of the respondent-State, and waives service. Learned counsel for the pe present petition with a direction to the learned trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the bail application, to be filed by the petitioner. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-46335-2025 DECIDED ON: 26.08.202 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH Advocate for the petitioner. This is a petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’), for quashing passed by the learned Chief Judicial (hereinafter referred to as ‘trial Court’). Vide abovesaid the proclamation, issued against the petitioner, was duly effected and Notice of motion to respondent No.1 only. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab appears State, and waives service. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the a direction to the learned trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the bail application, to be filed by the petitioner. .2025 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS ratiya Nagarik for quashing of Chief Judicial . Vide abovesaid petitioner, was duly effected and appears titioner wants to withdraw the a direction to the learned trial Court to expeditiously GAURAV THAKUR 2025.08.27 09:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- the learned trial trial Court of the bail application, if moved by the petiti days thereafter. exercise of its dis impose penalty under Section 491 of BNSS (erstwhile Section 446 of CrPC). disposed of. Gaurav Thakur -46335-2025 In view of above, the petitioner is directed to the learned trial Court within 15 days and if al Court within the stipulated period, the learned trial Court shall dispose of the bail application, if moved by the petiti thereafter. It is however clarified that the learned trial Court in the exercise of its discretion may take the petitioner impose penalty under Section 491 of BNSS (erstwhile Section 446 of CrPC). With the abovementioned directions, disposed of. 2 In view of above, the petitioner is directed to surrender before and if he surrenders before the learned , the learned trial Court shall dispose of the bail application, if moved by the petitioner, within a period of three clarified that the learned trial Court in the cretion may take the petitioner in judicial custody or impose penalty under Section 491 of BNSS (erstwhile Section 446 of CrPC). With the abovementioned directions, the present petition stand surrender before before the learned , the learned trial Court shall dispose three clarified that the learned trial Court in the in judicial custody or impose penalty under Section 491 of BNSS (erstwhile Section 446 of CrPC). stands GAURAV THAKUR 2025.08.27 09:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document