HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7690 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard counsel for the applicants, Sri Neeraj Kumar Sharma, learned AGA for the State and perused the material on record. 2. This application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants in Case Crime No. 304 of 2024, under sections 147, 323, 352, 307 of I.P.C., Police Station- Nai Mandi, District- Muzaffarnagar. 3. Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. A matrimonial dispute between the son of the informant and co-accused, Himanshi (daughter-in-law of the informant) has been given colour of a criminal case. The applicants are the relatives of co- accused, Himanshi. In the alleged incident, the informant has not received any injury. No medical report is available in the case diary. The alleged video footage does not connect the applicants with the offence. Investigation has been completed. Charge-sheet has been filed. The applicants had cooperated in the investigation. The applicants have been summoned by the concerned court. No custodial interrogation is required. Further, the co- accused, Himanshi and Anju Singhal have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 15.09.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 7511 of 2025 (Himanshi and another vs. State of U.P. and Another). The applicants claim parity. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. The applicants have apprehension of their arrest in the above mentioned case. In case, the applicants are granted anticipatory bail, they will not misuse the said liberty. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kanhaiya Mishra, Sandeep Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Renu Singhal And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicants and the fact that in the alleged incident, the informant has not received any injury; at this stage, there is no substantive evidence against the applicants, the co-accused, Himanshi and Anju Singhal have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court; charge-sheet has been filed, the applicants had cooperated in the investigation and no custodial interrogation is required, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 6. In the event of arrest, the applicants Renu Singhal, Satish Singhal, Gourav Singhal and Jag Roshan Goyal, involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) the applicants shall make themselves available on each date fixed in the matter by the court concerned; (ii) the applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court; (iii) the applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passport the same shall be deposited by them before the concerned court. 7. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 8. The application stands disposed of. September 19, 2025 Sachin Mishra NABAIL No. 7690 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad