Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9382 (RAJ)

RITESH PATNI v. UNION BANK OF INDIA AND ANR

CW/1834/2006 · 2025-03-24

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:13258] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1834/2006 Ritesh Patni Son Of Shri Satish Kumar Patni, aged 32 years, Resident Of 872, Patni Bhawan, Khuteton Ka Rasta, 1St Crossing Kishanpole Bazaar Jaipur, Proprietor M/s Vijay Laxmi Traders. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Bank Of India, Regional Office B-100, University Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur Through Its Regional Manager. 2. Branch Manager, Union Bank Of India, Sdmh Branch, B- 100, University Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 24/03/2025 On 18.01.2024, i.e., when the case reached hearing last, following order was passed: “This petition was filed aggrieved of the recovery proceedings initiated by the respondent-Bank. None appears for parties. Let counsel for petitioner apprise the Court with regard to the current status of the loan account and proceedings initiated if any under “Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act”. Today also, none appears for the petitioner even in second round. [2025:RJ-JP:13258] (2 of 2) [CW-1834/2006] In view thereof, this writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /48