( 2025:JHHC:11679 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2987 of 2025 ------ Golu Ravidas @ Kumar Ram, Aged about -23 years, Son of – Sri Dinesh Ravidas @ Dinesh Ram, Resident of Village –Bari Kodarjanna, Post Office –Sahibganj, Police Station –Mufassil, District –Sahibganj. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. R.R. Shekhar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 16.04.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No.101 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 74/137(2)/87 of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner kidnapped the minor victim girl for compelling her to marry. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner drawing attention of this Court to annexure -2 at page nos. 22-23 of the brief, which is the copy of the certified copy of the informatory petition filed by the alleged victim in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj vide MCA No. 2079 of 2024 that therein it has categorically been stated by her that the victim is a major lady and is in love with the petitioner and wants to spend her life with him. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.01.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para –11 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Sahibganj, in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No.101 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/