Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93819 (ALL)

ANKUR YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/30154/2024 · 2025-10-05

Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 30154 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Case taken up on mention. 2. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri J.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents. 3. The name of Sri Satyendra Kumar Pal is mentioned as counsel for opposite party no.2 but he is not present. 4. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing the entire criminal proceeding of Case No. 12329 of 2022 pending before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur including the chargesheet dated 13.11.2022 as well as cognizance order dated 14.12.2022 relating to Case Crime No. 721 of 20202 under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 504, 506, 34 IPC, P.S. Hapur Nagar, District Hapur. 5. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on record. It is also submitted that in view of the said compromise, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicants. 6. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection to the above submissions. 7. In view of the fact that the applicants and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on record, keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 OR Naushey Ali & Others Vs. State of U.P. & Another, 2025 INSC 182 and the facts of the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Satyendra Kumar Pal Ankur Yadav And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicants. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 8. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Case No. 12329 of 2022 pending before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur relating to Case Crime No. 721 of 20202 under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 504, 506, 34 IPC, P.S. Hapur Nagar, District Hapur are hereby quashed. 9. Accordingly, the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. October 6, 2025 Madhurima A482 No. 30154 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad