Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9381 (AP)

SRIKALAHASTHI MUNCIPALITY v. SRI M.L.PRASAD AND 7 OTHERS

WA/988/2017 · 2025-07-31

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010103932017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI r-* FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 988 OF 2017 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dt. 06-02-2017 in W.P.M.P.No.3486 of 2017 in WP.No.2961 of 2017 on the file of High Court. Between: Srikalahasthi Muncipality, Rep. by its Commissioner, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District. ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT No.3 AND 1. Sri M. L. Prasad, S/o. Mannuru Lokanadam, Aged about 44 years, R/o. D.No.9-44, Naidu Buildings, Gopalavanam, Srikalahasthi, Chittoor District. Smt. Yanamandala Chitra, W/o. Venkateswara Chowdary, Aged about 42 years, R/o. Shanthi Nagar, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 2. ...RESPONDENTS/WRIT PETITIOERS 3. The State of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. The District Collector, Chittoor District, Chittoor. 4. f 5. Deputy Executive Engineer, Srikalahasti Municipality, Chittoor District. 6. The Chief Planning Officer, Chittoor, Chittoor District. J.jThe Town Planning Officer, phittoor District 8. Mr. Jaya Krishna Reddy, S/o. Not Known, Aged about 35 years, R/o. Srikalahasthi Town, Chittoor District. Srikalahasti Municipality, Srikalahasti (Respondent Nos.5 & 7 are not necessary parties to the Writ appeal) ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTNos.1,2, 4 to 7 lA NO: 1 OF 2017fWAMP 1922 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dt. 06-02-2017 passed in WP.MP.No.3486 of 2017 in WP.No.2961 of 2017 pending disposal of the Writ Appeal before this Hon’ble Court. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GUDAPATI LAKSHMINARAYANA, SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2:SRI A. CHANDRAIH NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 6:GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5,7 & 8;— The Court made the following iJUDGMENT APHC010103932017 Bench Sr.No:-9 [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 1^ •ii-. WRIT APPEAL NO: 988 of 2017 Srikalahasthi Municipality, represented by its Commissioner ...Appellant Vs. ...Respondents Sri M. L. Prasad and others ********** Sri Gudapati Lakshminarayana, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities in Rayalaseema Region Advocate for Appellant Learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, learned Government Revenue, Advocate for Respondents for Pleader Sri A. Chandraiah Naidu. CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 1st August 2025 PC : Sri Gudapati Lakshminarayana, learned Standing Counsel for the appellant, states that the matter has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. 2. I Sd/- V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri A. Chandraih Naidu, Advocate [OPUC] Sri Gudapati Lakshminarayana, SC for Municipalities 3. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Deveiopment, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies. V \ ssb N HIGH COURT DATED:01/08/2025 JUDGMENT WA No. 988 OF 2017 DISPOSING OF THE W.A. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS