[2025:RJ-JP:18208] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2657/2025 1. Mahendra S/o Bhaggi, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Jaisora, (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bayana). 2. Laxmansingh S/o Gajraj Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Jaisora, (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bayana). 3. Fauji S/o Ramjilal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Jasora, Police Station Gadhibajna, District Bharatpur. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bayana). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3150/2025 1. Gopal S/o Bhaggi, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Jaisora Police Staiton Gadhibajna, District Bharatpur ( At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bayana) 2. Sheeshram S/o Ramcharan Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Jaisora Police Staiton Gadhibajna, District Bharatpur ( At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bayana) 3. Brijesh S/o Kallasingh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Jaisora Police Staiton Gadhibajna, District Bharatpur ( At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bayana) 4. Vishram S/o Ramcharan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Jaisora Police Staiton Gadhibajna, District Bharatpur ( At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bayana) 5. Virendrasingh S/o Ramjilal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Jaisora Police Staiton Gadhibajna, District Bharatpur ( At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bayana) ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Timman Singh [2025:RJ-JP:18208] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2657/2025] Mr. Munesh Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. RR Baisla HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 30/04/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0004/2025 registered at Police Station-Gadhi Bajana, District-Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 125 of BNS. 2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are decided by a single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the complainant are ad idem that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties. In support of this contention, learned counsel for the petitioners have filed compromise deed. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners are behind the Bar since 05.02.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. The contention of the counsel for the petitioner is supported by the counsel for the complainant. [2025:RJ-JP:18208] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2657/2025] 6. Learned Public Prosecutor formally opposes the bail application. 7. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 8. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Mahendra S/o Bhaggi (2) Laxmansingh S/o Gajraj Singh (3) Fauji S/o Ramjilal (4) Gopal S/o Bhaggi (5) Sheeshram S/o Ramcharan Singh (6) Brijesh S/o Kallasingh (7)Vishram S/o Ramcharan (8) Virendrasingh S/o Ramjilal shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Sunita/118-119