PRIYANKA SAXENA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
HABC/819/2025 · 2025-09-09
Vinod Diwakar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93771 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93771 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 819 of 2025 Court No. - 85 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J.
1. Shri Chandra Prakash Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Shri Jata Shankar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the instant petition.
2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. September 10, 2025 Shafique Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jata Shankar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Vinod Diwakar,J.) Priyanka Saxena And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAFIKUR RAHAMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SAFIKUR RAHAMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SAFIKUR RAHAMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad