HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20160 of 2025 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Bind, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State respondents. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that proceedings U/S 3/4 of the U.P. Control of Gundas Act, 1996 have been initiated against the petitioner and the competent authority has passed an order for externment from District Farrukhabad for a period of three months from the date the order has been passed on 15.07.2025. 3. The petitioner being aggrieved by the said order has preferred an appeal before the Commissioner, Kanpur and his application for interim relief has been rejected by means of impugned order dated 13.08.2025. 4. After arguing the matter at some length , learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case the appeal preferred before the Commissioner, Kanpur is decided with expedition. 5. Learned A.G.A. does not oppose the aforesaid prayer. 6.. Considering the aforesaid facts, without entering into merits Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Bind Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Pankaj Dubey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2 / Commissioner, Kanpur Division, Kanpur to decide the appeal preferred by the petitioner expeditiously, say, within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him in accordance with law and communicate his decision to the petitioner. September 17, 2025 Ravi/- CRLP No. 20160 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad