RAMKUNWAR AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/31792/2025 · 2025-09-10
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93749 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93749 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31792 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. Petitioners contend that they were granted plantation lease way back in the year 1987 for 30 years which came to an end in the year 2017. An application has been moved by the petitioners for renewal of the said lease, which is pending consideration.
2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent No. 3 to decide the application of petitioners for renewal of the lease deed, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
3. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 11, 2025 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Mishra, Vikas Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arun Kumar Pandey, C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Ramkunwar And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad