1 2025:CGHC:9289-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 92 of 2025 Pusauram Sahu S/o Late Itwari Ram Sahu Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Kothar, P.S. And Tahsil Pipariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Superintendent Of Police Kabirdham District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 3 - Station House Officer P.S. Pipariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 4 - Chhoturam Sahu S/o Dhalguram Sahu Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Lenjakhar, Post Podi, P.S. Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 5 - Uttam Prasad Sahu S/o Jagtu Ram Sahu Aged About 70 Years R/o Village Kothar, P.S. And Tahsil Pipariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 6 - Hariram Sahu S/o Jagtu Ram Sahu Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Kothar, P.S. And Tahsil Pipariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 7 - Gopal Sahu S/o Feruram Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Kothar, P.S. And Tahsil Pipariya, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Respondents _________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Paras Sahu holding brief of Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 24 . 02 .202 5 1. Heard Paras Sahu holding brief of Mr. Mayank Chandrakar, ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Date: 2025.02.24 17:08:11 +0530 2 learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State / respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs : “10.1 To call for the records of the case for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. 10.2 To issue an appropriate writ or order and direct the respondent no.2 & 3 to conduct the strict investigation on the basis of written complaint made by the petitioners against the private respondents and to register crime against the private respondents under the appropriate provisions of B.N.S. as far as possible. 10.3 To issue an appropriate writ or order and direct the respondent no.2 & 3 to register the criminal case against the private respondents for offence punishable u/s 318(4), 388, 336(3) and 340(2) of B.N.S being cognizable offence for committing crime against the petitioner in the interest of justice. 10.4. Any other relief deemed fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted.” 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that despite written complaint being made by the petitioner to respondent Nos. 2 & 3, they have not taken any action on the complaints made by the petitioner. 4. Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has submitted that the grievance of the petitioner can be very well redressed before the 3 competent Court by filing an application under Section 156 (3) or 200 of the Cr.P.C. He further submitted that the controversy involved in the present matter has already been decided by the High Court of Allahabad in Misc. Bench No. 24492 of 2020 : Waseem Haider Vs. State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary, Home Others vide judgment and order dated 14.12.2020 as well as by this Court in WPCR No.333 of 2020 (Akhilesh Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 12.04.2023, dismissing the said petition, hence, the present petition be also dismissed in terms of the said order. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate Forum. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra