Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93724 (PNJ)

MANOJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/52550/2023 · 2025-05-19

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

258 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-52550-2023 DECIDED ON: 19.05.2025 MANOJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL. Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Sandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. None for respondent No.2. ***** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.0257, dated 27.10.2015 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 452, 511, 342, 323, 427, 506, 149 IPC registered at Police Station City Kapurthala, District Kapurthala, with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 04.09.2023 (Annexure P-2). It has been informed by learned State counsel that petitioner No.2 has been declared PO. According to the report dated 05.03.2024, it is evident that petitioner No.2 failed to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of his statement. It is also apparent that till today, compliance of the order dated 23.09.2024 has not been made. Moreover, since 16,01.2025, the petitioners are un-represented. Today again no one has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioners. SHAM SUNDER 2025.05.20 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-52550-2023 -2- In view of above, this Court is convinced that petitioners do not want to pursue with the present petition. As such, the same is dismissed for non-prosecution. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 19.05.2025 JUDGE Sham Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SHAM SUNDER 2025.05.20 09:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document