HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 10944 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed for following relief: "Directed the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Allahabad to decide the Suit No. 239 of 2018 (Rajdhari and others Versus Shobhalal and others) within stipulated period as fix by this Hon'ble Court, without granting any adjournment to either party." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the suit is pending since 2018. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that several dates have been fixed but the same has not been decided yet. He prayed that the same may be decided expeditiously. 4. No useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Allahabad to consider and decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, after ensuring service upon all the parties concerned and after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned as well as opportunity to lead evidence in support of their case and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 15, 2025 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhola Nath Yadav, Priyavrat Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Rajdhari And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Sukhna Devi And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad