MANZOOR AHMAD DAR v. SHALINDER KUMAR AND ORS. (PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT)
CCP(S)/503/2022 · 2025-08-25
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9372 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9372 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.8 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 503/2022 In[WP(C) 2972/2019] Manzoor Ahmad Dar …Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs. Shalinder Kumar & Ors ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Mohd Younis Hafiz, Assisting Counsel vice Mr. Abdul Rashid Malik, Sr. AAG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER 25.08.2025
1. It is being reported by Mr. Mohd Younis Hafiz learned Assisting Counsel appearing vice Mr. Abdul Rashid Malik, learned Senior Additional Advocate General that due compliance to the writ court order dated 25.08.2022 has been carried out by making payment of Rs. 17.44 lacs in favour of the petitioner along with interest accruing thereupon and to this effect the learned Assisting Counsel submits that the advancement of directed payment came to take place after the last order dated 01.08.2025, as such, this
contempt petition has attained its purpose and be consigned to records.
2. The contempt petition is accordingly consigned to records, subject to liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner that in case the petitioner would reckon that he was having a subsisting cause to pursue the contempt petition related to recovery of the entire amount then the petitioner may file an application for restoration of contempt petition within 30 days next.
3. Contempt petition is disposed of.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 25.08.2025
“Mir Arif”