Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93688 (ALL)

SEWAK RAM BANSAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIA/13442/2025 · 2025-09-09

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13442 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:- "i. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to ensure the payment of full G.P.F. amount with interest (since 31.03.2015 till date) including the amount due towards bonus, arrears and dearness allowance to the petitioner; ii. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 19.07.2022 followed by reminders dated 02.08.2022 & 13.08.2022 as expeditiously as possible preferably within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court;" 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioners may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajeet Kumar, Avadh Pratap Singh Shishodia Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sewak Ram Bansal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) behalf of the State-respondent nos.1 to 5, Sri Vinod Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.6 & 7, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.3 within two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.3, Deputy Director of Education (Secondary Education), Meerut Division, Meerut is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. September 10, 2025 Atul WRIA No. 13442 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad