Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93671 (ALL)

SMT RANJANA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/31482/2025 · 2025-09-16

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31482 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. The fair price shop license of the petitioners was cancelled by the order dated 13.09.2024 passed by the respondent No.4/Sub Division Officer, Burhanpur District Azamgarh. Aggrieved with the aforesaid order, statutory appeal, along with delay condonation application, has been filed before the Deputy (Food) Commissioner, Azamgarh Division Azamgarh as provided under Section 13(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Essential Commodities (Regulation of Sale and Distribution Control) Order, 2016 which was numbered as Appeal No.C202415000001654. 2. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioners that the statutory appeal was filed by the petitioner is still pending consideration and till date no decision has been taken in the matter but the respondents are taking steps for fresh allotment of the aforesaid fair price shop in question. Hence a prayer has been made to restrain the respondents not to make any fresh allotment of fair price shop in favour of any other person. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 4. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the respondent No.7 to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the respondent No.7 feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the Appellate Authority to decide the aforesaid Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Prakash Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt Ranjana .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) appeal expeditiously and strictly in accordance with law but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties. 6. It is made clear that in case, any allotment will be made or any allotment has already been made during the pendency of the appeal, the same should be depend final outcome of the final decision taken in the appeal. September 17, 2025 saqlain WRIC No. 31482 of 2025 2 (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad