Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9367 (JHR)

AMARNATH ARVIND KUMAR DIWAKAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/230/2023 · 2025-01-03

S N Pathak

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C) No. 230 of 2023 ---------- Amarnath Arvind Kumar Diwakar, aged about 67 years, son of Late Mahadeo Prasad, resident of Basudeopur, P.O. Basudeopur, P.S. Sadar, Dist.- Munger, Bihar ………… Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Mr. L. Khiangte, father’s name not known to the petitioner, Principal Secretary, Department of Forest, Environment & Climate Change, Government of Jharkhand at Van Bhawan, Doranda, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, Dist.-Ranchi 3.Mr. Sanjay Srivastava, father’s name not known to the Petitioner, Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Department of Forest, Environment & Climate Change, Government of Jharkhand, at Van Bhawan, Doranda, P.O. & P.S.- Doranda, Dist.-Ranchi ………… Opp. Parties ------- CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the O.Ps. : Mr. Indranil Bhaduri, SC-IV ---------- 21/ 03.01.2025 Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that substantial compliance of the Court’s order is made, since it has been specific averment made in the show-cause that already steps have been taken for compliance. 2. In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties, it appears that substantial compliance has been made and as such no contempt is made out against the opposite parties. The same is hereby dropped. 3. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of. (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.) Rohit/-