Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93660 (PAT)

Pradeep Kumar Shrivastava v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/13623/2025 · 2025-10-31

Rajesh Kumar Verma, Sudhir Singh

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13623 of 2025 ====================================================== Pradeep Kumar Shrivastava S/o Harendra Nath Srivastava, Resident of village- Mukundiya, Panchayat Basdila, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Gopalganj. 2. The Circle Officer, Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Shyamli Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 2 31-10-2025 Following is the relief sought for in the present writ application:- “(i) For issuance of writ of mandamus for commanding/directing the respondent authorities to dispose the representation dated 23.05.2025 as contained in annexure-P1 of this writ application by way of Public Interest Litigation by which the respondent authorities were requested to remove encroachment from Khata No.- 48, Khesara No.- 386, type of land Gairmajarua Aam, mauza- Mukundiya, Panchayat- Basdila, Circle-Gopalganj, District-Gopalganj, the said land has been encroached by local unsocial aliments. (ii) For issuance of appropriate writ of Patna High Court CWJC No.13623 of 2025(2) dt.31-10-2025 2/2 mandamus commanding/directing the respondent authorities to do measurement of the land according to government map and remove the all encroachments made upon it by the antisocial elements. (iii) For issuance of other relief/reliefs, order/orders, direction/directions, writ/writs in the fact and circumstances of the case.” 2. A representation has been made to the Respondent No. 1. The Respondent No. 1 is directed to look into the matter and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. 3. With the aforesaid observation, the present writ application stands disposed of. Sachin/- (Sudhir Singh, ACJ) (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U