Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9366 (JHR)

SURAJ DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3389/2025 · 2025-08-29

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:26140 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3389 of 2025 ------ Suraj Das, aged about 25 Years, S/o-Nepal Das, R/o Village Bewa, P.O. & P.S.-Mihijam, District-Jamtara … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioner : M/s. Ashutosh Pd. Joshi, Advocate For the State : M/s. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Special P.P. ----- 03/29.08.2025 I.A. No. 8135 of 2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Interlocutory Application. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this Interlocutory Application is dismissed as withdrawn. B.A. No. 3389 of 2025 Heard the parties 2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with (Ranchi) Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 228 of 2024, for the offences registered under Sections 318(4). 319(2), 336(3) of the B.N.S. and Section 66C, 66D of the I.T. Act, pending in the Court of Sri Manish Ranjan, learned A.J.C.-II, Ranchi. 3. On 17.12.2024, the informant had filed the present F.I.R. alleging that Rs. 20,434/-and Rs. 9995/-were withdrawn by using his credit and debit card respectively of Axis bank. 4. During the course of investigation, it transpired that the mobile phone of this petitioner was used in committing the said fraud. 5. The said mobile phone was recovered from the petitioner in another case. 6. Considering the fact that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent, I am not inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected at this stage. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Nandini/- Uploaded