Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93647 (ALL)

MANJU KHATIK v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

CRLR/5301/2025 · 2025-09-09

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5301 of 2025 Court No. - 86 HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. are present. 2. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that she wants to withdraw this revision with liberty to file afresh before appropriate Bench, therefore, the same may be dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file fresh. 3. In view of the above, this revision is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 4. Certified copy of the relevant documents be returned to the learned counsel for the revisionist as per Rules. September 10, 2025 Fhd Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Bharti Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.) Manju Khatik .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad