Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9363 (PAT)

Tuntun Thakur v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./2989/2025 · 2025-06-27

Rajiv Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2989 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2024 Thana- Bijdhari District- East Champaran ====================================================== Tuntun Thakur Son of Sukhal Thakur Resident of Village - Lalachhapra, Ward No.- 2, P.S.- Bijdhari, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Patel, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 5 27-06-2025 Heard Mr. Shivendra Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State. 2. As per the prosecution story, the informant, daughter of the deceased alleged that her father was having Rs. 90,000/- by selling of the land and her uncle (petitioner herein) wanted his share for which, they were regularly quarreling. The informant asked her late father to get a panchayati called for an amicable settlement but before the same could take place, came to know about the killing of her father on 22.08.2024 at 06:00 AM. This led to the F.I.R. 3. Considering the changed version in the case diary, on 19.04.2025 this Court directed the Superintendent of Police, East Champaran, Motihari to look into the matter and get the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2989 of 2025(5) dt.27-06-2025 2/5 case investigated through the Police Officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police and submit a report. 4. Accordingly, a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Superintendent of Police, East Champaran, Motihari and the report annexed with the counter affidavit read as follows: i=kad 2206@25 vuqeaMy iqfyl inkf/kdkjh dk dk;kZy;] idM+hn;ky] fnukad&28-5-25 isz’kd] lgk;d iqfyl v/kh{kd&lg& vuqeaMy iqfyl inkf/kdkjh] idM+hn;kyA lsok esa] iqfyl v/kh{kd] iwohZ pEikj.k] eksfrgkjhA fo’k;%&fct/kjh Fkkuk dkaM la[;k&12@24 esa vU; vfHk;qDrksa ds ?kVuk esa lafyIrrk ds fcUnq ij tkWp izfrosnu lefiZr djus ds laca/k esaA egk”k;] mi;qZDr fo’k; ds laca/k esa lknj lwfpr djuk gS fd fct/kjh Fkkuk dkaM la[;k&12@24 esa vU; vfHk;qDrksa ds ?kVuk esa lafyIrrk ds fcUnq ij tkWp gsrq ,l0vkbZ0Vh0 Vhe dk xBu fd;k x;k gS ftlesa esjs usr`Ro esa fct/kjh Fkkuk dkaM la[;k&12@24 dk tkWp fd;k x;kA tkWp ds dze esa Kkr gqvk fd fct/kjh Fkkuk dkaM la[;k &12@24 ds okfnuh lqeu dqekjh ifr v”kksd dqekj Bkdqj lk0 lqUnjiqj o`rk Vksyk Fkkuk fct/kjh ftyk iwohZ pEikj.k }kjk bl dkaM esa ekuuh; U;k;ky; ds le{k dkaM ds izkFkfedh vfHk;qDr dks ?kVuk esa “kkfey ugha jgus dk ckr crk;k x;k gS rFkk nwljs O;fDr }kjk gR;k djus dh ckr U;k;ky; esa crk;k x;k gSA mDRk dksVZ ds i= dk tkWp fd;k x;k rks okfnuh lqeu Patna High Court CR. MISC. MISC. No.2989 of 2025(5) dt.27-06-2025 3/5 dqekjh }kjk crk;k x;k fd esjh pkph izHkkorh nsoh esjs ikl pkj&ikWp ckj vk;h Fkh rFkk cksyh fd tk; nks tks gqvk lks gqvk pkpk xyrh ugha fd;k gS mls ekQ dj nks rFkk cksyh fd eq>s 06 cPpk gS rqEgkjs pkpk tsy esa jgsxs rks ge lc Hkw[ks ej tk;saxsA 06&06 ybZdu dks dgkW ysdj tk;sxsA iSlk esjh pkpk ,d :i;k ugha nh gS rFkk tehu Hkh ugh nh gSA ;s vkxs crk;h fd buds firk }kjk 08 /kwj tehu cspk x;k Fkk ftldk fojks/k buds pkpk VquVqu Bkdqj }kjk fd;k rFkk blh Hkwfe fookn ds pyrs buds pkpk }kjk buds firk dk gR;k dj fn;k x;k gSA bl laca/k esa VquVqu Bkdqj ls iwNrkN fd;k x;k rks muds }kjk igys crk;s fd 19 vxLr 2024 dks j{kk ca/ku ds fnu ?kj vk;s rFkk ckn esa vjsjkt pys x;s Fks rFkk ?kVuk ds fnu ;gkW ugha FksA tc buds HkkbZ dh gR;k dk lwpuk feyk rc ;s okil ?kj vk;sA bl laca/k esa VquVqu Bkdqj ls nqckjk iwNrkN fd;k rks og crk;s fd ftl fnu esjs HkkbZ dh gR;k gqvk mlds vxys fnu lqcg esa ge vius ckcwth dks ysdj vLirky pys x;s Fks rFkk ;s vjsjkt pys x;s Fks ;kuh fnukad 22-05- 25 dh ckr gSA ;s vkSj budh iRuh buds firkth dks ysdj gkWLihVy pys x;sA gkWLihVy ls ;s vjsjkt pys x;s FksA budh iRuh gkWLihVy ls ckcwth dks ysdj ?kj vk;h FkhA fQj ;s cksys fd iRuh budsk Qksu ij cksyh fd HkSlwj dk gR;k gks x;k rFkk bldh iRuh gh eaVw nkl dks Hkh lwpuk nh FkhA rc ;s okil vjsjkt ls ?kj vk;sA ?kVuk ds fnu buds ?kj ij eqxkZ cuk gqvk Fkk ftldks ;s glqvk ls dkV cM+s HkS;k ckcw th ds bZykt djokus gsrq 2600 :i;k fn;s FksA bl dkaM ds vfHk;qDr VquVqu Bkdqj }kjk igys fnukad 19-08- 24 dks j{kkca/ku ds fnu ?kj vkus dh ckr crk;k x;k rFkk fQj vjsjkt pys tkus dh ckr crk;k x;kA fnukad 21-08-24 dks vjsjkt esa “kke esa okil ?kj vkus dh ckr crk;k x;k gS rFkk fnukad 22-08-24 dks gkWLihVy ls vjsjkt pys tkus dh ckr crk;k x;k gSA bl laca/k esa dkaM ds vfHk;qDr VquVqu Bkdqj ds eksckbZy uEcj 6203181731 dk Vkoj yksds”ku fnukad 19-08-24 ls 22-08-24 rd izkIr fd;k x;k gS ftlds voyksdu ls Kkr gqvk fd fnukad 19-08-24 dks VquVqu Bkdqj dk yksds”ku ykyk Nijk ds ikl o ?kj ls djhc 04 fd0eh0 ds bnZ fxnZ izkIr gqvk gS] fnukad 20-08-24 dks ykyk Nijk ls 06 fd0eh0 ds vklikl ik;k x;k ,oa 21-08-24 dks vf/kdre nwjh 06 fd0eh0 ik;k x;k gS rFkk ?kVuk ds frfFk fnukad 22-08-24 dks 07%44 ls 11%16 cts rd ykyk Nijk pkSd] 12%25 ls Patna High Court CR. MISC. MISC. No.2989 of 2025(5) dt.27-06-2025 4/5 15%00 cts rd izHkkr flag fu;j tkudh fiDpj Iys”k dslfj;k ,oa 15%05 ls 16%06 cts rd ykyk Nijk pkSd tks lHkh ?kVukLFky ls djhc 02@04 fd0eh0 ds vanj gS rFkk fnukad 22-08-24 dks le; 16%06 ds ckn eksckbZy can gks x;kA ykyk Nijk cht/kjh Fkkuk ls vjsjkt dh nwjh djhc 30 fd0 eh0 dh gSA okfnuh dh pkph izHkkorh nsoh ls iwNrkN fd;k x;k rks muds }kjk crk;k x;k fd tc ;s MkWDVj ds ikl ls vk;h rks budks “kke esa irk pyk fd iz”kklu vk;k gqvk gS rFkk buyksxksa ls dksbZ iwNrkN ugha fd;k x;kA ;s cdjh pjkrs gSaA budks ;s irk ugha gS fd dc ekjk gSA rc iz”kklu budks xkMh esa cSBk fy;sA mudks dkSu ekjk ;s ugh tkurh gSA ;s vkxs crk;h fd ;s lqeu ls feyus x;h Fkh rFkk cksyh fd pkpk dks ckgj fudkyks uk] ;s vuqjks/k djus lqeu ds ikl x;h Fkh rFkk cksyh fd tcku tcku rhu dks ybZdh ck yM+dk lc Hkw[ks ejk rk] dqy 06 cPpk budks gSA mYys[kuh; gS fd dkaM esa tkWp esa okfnuh o vfHk;qDr o vfHk;qDr dh iRuh ds c;ku ls ;g ckr izdk”k esa vk jgh gS fd pkph ds nckc o vuqjks/k ij bl dkaM dh okfnuh }kjk ekuuh; U;k;ky; esa vius firk dh gR;k dk vkjksi fdlh vU; vKkr ij yx;k x;k gS tcfd okfnuh ds firk dh gR;k muds HkkbZ }kjk gh fd;k x;k gSA lkFk gh ?kVuk ds frfFk dks vfHk;qDr dk Vkoj yksds”ku ykyk Nijk pkSd ls 06 fd0eh0 ds nwjh ij jgs gS rFkk og fnukad 19-08-24 ls 22-08-24 ds chp dHkh vjsjkt ugha x;s gS] pqfd ykyk Nijk pkSd ls vjsjkt dh nwjh djhc 30 fd0eh0 gS rFkk vfHk;qDr VquVqu Bkdqj dk yksds”ku ?kVukLFky ls vf/kdre nwjh djhc 06 fd0eh0 rd gh gSA gR;k ds fnu VquVqu Bkdqj }kjk ;wful [kku ls /kkjnkj pkdw dk ekax Hkh fd;k Fkk ijUrq ;wful [kku pkdw ugh fn;k ftlds Qsj esa og dbZ txg Hkh x;k Fkk ml fnu vfHk;qDr ds ?kj eqxkZ cuk FkkA lHkh ds c;ku ls ;g Li’V gS fd okfnuh ds pkpk }kjk ckj&ckj viuk c;ku cny dj >wB cksyk tk jgk gS] ftlls mudh gR;k esa lafyIrrk dk lansg gSA vr% Jheku~ lwpuk dks lwpukFkZA g0@& vLi’V lgk;d iqfyl v/kh{kd&lg& vuqeaMy iqfyl inkf/kdkjh] idM+hn;kyA Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2989 of 2025(5) dt.27-06-2025 5/5 5. MISC. No.2989 of 2025(5) dt.27-06-2025 5/5 5. The report clearly shows that the alibi taken by the petitioner has been found to be incorrect and further the deceased family was forced to change the version in that background and considering that the role of the petitioner has been authenticated by even the SIT headed by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, in that background, the Court is not inclined to confirm the provisional bail granted to the petitioner on 19.04.2025. 6. The petitioner as such, is directed to surrender within seven days from today and the surrender certificate be filed by 09.07.2025. 7. The petition stands dismissed. 8. List this under the heading ‘To Be Mentioned’ on 11.07.2025 to peruse the surrender certificate. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T