Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93623 (ALL)

SAKET JAIN AND 34 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13879/2025 · 2025-09-15

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13879 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard Mr. Navin Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Bipin Bihari Pandey, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 & 4 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to Respondent No. 2 to pass an appropriate order on the petitioners’ pending online transfer applications, submitted in accordance with their respective preferences. The petitioners further pray for a direction to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to effect their transfers to the districts of their choice, as indicated in their online applications, strictly in accordance with the Government Orders dated 23.05.2025, 05.06.2025, and 16.06.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners who are 35 in numbers were appointed as Assistant Teachers in various Primary Schools and Upper Primary Schools at different districts and applications have been given by the petitioners for considering their inter district transfer at Primary Schools and Upper Primary Schools at different districts of their preference but the applications have not been considered till date. Learned counsel for respondent nos.2 & 4 submits that she has no objection, in case, fresh representations are moved by the petitioners individually before the authorities concerned for redressal of their grievance, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that petitioners may make Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Navin Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bipin Bihari Pandey, C.S.C. Saket Jain And 34 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) fresh applications/representations, individually, ventilating all their grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.2 Secretary, Basic Education Board, U.P., Prayagraj, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 16, 2025 Jitendra/- WRIA No. 13879 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad