Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIG Chandan Naik
State of Odisha others
THE HON'B THE HON
1. Mrs. Pa Advocate appe 3rd February, 2 Police personn party no.5 (s appears on beh
2. Paragrap reproduced bel
Order No.
03.
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTA WPCRL No.3 of 2025
Naik .....
Repres Mr. D.R. Pa versus-
disha and .....
Repre Mrs. S. P
CORAM:
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND E HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER 06.02.2025
Pattanayak, learned advocate, Additio e appears on behalf of State and with referen uary, 2025 submits, the young adult girl is ersonnel in plain clothes and counselor atta shelter) are also present. Mr. Parida, on behalf of petitioner, who is interested in h ragraphs 1 and 3 from order dated 15th ed below. p. 1 UTTACK Petitioner epresented by Adv.- .R. Parida, Advocate Opposite Parties Represented by Adv.- S. Pattanayak, AGA
SINHA, HOO dditional Government reference to order dated girl is present in Court. attached to opposite arida, learned advocate d in her welfare. January, 2025 are
“1. Mr. petitione Ms. Jan with/in o He subm
3. We h petitione complai girl. On Court fr case”
Paragarph-2 fro
“2. Mr Governm submits, Court.”
3. We have petitioner. We well looked a present in Cou will look after
4. Mrs. Pa shelter till peti majority and it
Mr. Parida, learned advocate appears o tioner and submits, his client is interested Jangyasini Nayak. She has been illega /in opposite party no.5. He seeks interferen submits, there be direction to produce the g e have ascertained that the girl went tioner was accused to have kidnappe plaint lodged and F.I.R. registered, police . On behalf of petitioner her identity has be rt from statement made by the girl in the e
2 from order dated 3rd February, 2025 is re Mrs. Pattanayak, learned advocate, ernment Advocate appears on behalf o mits, a date be fixed for the girl to be ” e have interacted with the girl. She says she r. We have obtained confirmation from her ked after in the shelter. Mr. Parida subm in Court. On further query the girl tells us sh after her. rs. Pattanayak submits, the girl be directe ill petitioner duly marries her because the gir and it will be in interest of her safety. State p. 2 ars on behalf of sted in welfare of llegally confined ference of Court. e girl. ent missing and apped her. On olice rescued the as been shown to he earlier rescue 5 is reproduced below. ate, Additional lf of State and o be present in ys she wants to be with her that she has been submits, his client is s us she is confident he
directed to stay in the the girl has just attained State had wanted her to
be present so intention is to for herself. producing web will be at liber
5. The writ rasant Prasant
nt so that we are able to ascertain what is to stay with petitioner. The law presum elf. In the circumstances we direct tha g website copy of this order to opposite pa t liberty to either stay on in the shelter or go e writ petition is disposed of. ( Arinda Acting C
( M.S Ju p. 3 what she wants. Her resumes she can decide ct that petitioner, on site party no.5, the girl go with him.
rindam Sinha ) ng Chief Justice M.S. Sahoo ) Judge
Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT