Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9360 (JK)

FAYAZ AHMAD MIR v. JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD AND ANR

WP(C)/2599/2024 · 2025-09-30

Shahzad Azeem, Sindhu Sharma

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S. No. 21 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) No. 2599/2024 Fayaz Ahmad Mir …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. And Anr. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Shafqat Nazir, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MS JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE O R D E R 30.09.2025 Learned counsel for the respondents submits that petitioner has adjusted his account and there remains nothing balance with respect to loan account and as such learned counsel for applicant is not present to proceed with the proceedings under SARFAESI Act. In view of the aforesaid submission so made, this petition has become infructuous and is accordingly disposed of. Since, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner, he is at liberty to revive the same in case cause survives. (SHAHZAD AZEEM) (SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE JUDGE SRINAGAR 30.09.2025 Shabroz