HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31399 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. The petitioner before this Court claims that she has purchased a land through registered sale deed in the year 2022. An application for mutating her name was moved which was allowed. The private-respondent had moved a restoration application which was allowed and the case was restored to its original number. The mutation application is still pending for consideration. In the meantime, the petitioner has filed an application before the revenue authority for protecting her from being evicted from the property in dispute. 2. This Court finds that no such direction can be issued for deciding the said application. In case, the petitioner apprehends any danger for eviction, she may filed a suit against the private person restraining from evicting her. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court finds that no case for interference is made out. The writ petition is misconceived and stands dismissed. September 10, 2025 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Narayan Verma, U.S. Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Smt Hemlata Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad