Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93589 (ALL)

JAFAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/34957/2025 · 2025-09-18

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34957 of 2025 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Krishna Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. 2. This petition has been filed by the applicants for quashing of the impugned charge dated 24.02.2025 filed in case crime no. 10 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 352, 64(1), 87 BNS and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station - Nakhasa, District - Sambhal and summoning order dated 03.04.2025, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Sambhal at Chandausi, District - Sambhal. 3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that parties have amicably compromised their dispute which has been arrived at between the parties before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Chandausi, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise/agreement entered into between the parties. 4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the Court below, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court below. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Krishna Kumar Pandey, Manish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jafar And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) (POCSO Act), Sambhal at Chandausi, District - Sambhal that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise/agreement requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise/agreement. If the aforesaid compromise/agreement is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the Court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The Court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the parties to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 6. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 7. Original copy of compromise/agreement, if filed before this Court along with the present application, be returned to the learned counsel for applicants, as per Rules of Court. 8. With aforesaid directions, the application stands disposed of. September 19, 2025 A. Verma NA528 No. 34957 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad