VIJAY KUMAR v. TAJINDER MOHAN SINGH LIBERHAN AND ANR
CR/6306/2024 · 2025-04-24
Pankaj Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93584 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93584 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 148 CR-6306-2024 (O&M) Date of decision : 24.04.2025 Vijay Kumar ...... Petitioner versus Tajinder Mohan Singh Liberhan and another ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Tarun Seth, Advocate and Mr. Gagandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral)
1. At the outset, counsel for the petitioner submits that the possession of the demised premises already stands handed over to the respondent-landlord and the present revision petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
3. Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stands disposed off.
(PANKAJ JAIN)
JUDGE 24.04.2025
Dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No DINESH KUMAR 2025.04.28 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document