HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34537 of 2025 Court No. - 78 HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This Application u/s 528 BNSS has been filed with the prayer to quash the order dated 9.6.2025 passed by Session Judge, Firozabad in Misc. Application No.398 of 2025 (Adesh Vs. State of U.P.) arising out of case crime no.644 of 2020 under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 272 IPC and section 60/72 Excise Act, Police Station Shikohabad, District Firozabad. Further prayer has been made to direct the court concerned to accept the bail bonds of the applicant in the aforesaid crime number. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that earlier in case crime no.644 of 2020 under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 272 IPC and section 60/72 Excise Act, the applicant was granted anticipatory bail till the submission of police report under section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. However, after submission of charge-sheet, he again approached the Court for anticipatory bail till the end of trial and positive order was passed in his favour by the learned Session Judge, Firozabad but however within the stipulated period of time he could not produce sureties and personal bonds before the court concerned for the reason that he had been a serious heart patient and was unable to move and the said negligence was committed by him. It is further submitted that in the interest of justice, the extension of time to submit the personal bond and bail bonds before the court concerned may be granted. It is also submitted that an application with the aforesaid request was submitted before the Session Court at Firozabad but it was rejected vide order dated 9.6.2025. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nisha Chouhan, Shailendra Singh Rathore Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Adesh Kumar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer. 5. It appears from the perusal of the record that after considering all the aspects, the Session Judge, Firozabad had granted anticipatory bail in favour of the applicant but subsequently only for non-submission of personal bond and bail bonds within the stipulated time, his application for furnishing of the same before the court concerned was rejected. Since the charge-sheet in this matter has been submitted, if protection is not granted to the applicant, a great prejudice may be caused to him and he may be arrested in this matter, whereas anticipatory bail was already granted to him. 6. In view of that, the applicant is directed to submit the bail bonds and personal bond, as ordered earlier by the Session Court, within a period of one month from today and if he submits it before the Session Court, it shall be accepted on record by the Session Court. 7. On this ground, the present application is allowed accordingly. October 8, 2025 ss NA528 No. 34537 of 2025 2 (Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad