HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31331 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Sri Uday Bhan, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 6 has filed Vakalatnama in the Court today and the same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. 3. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital/live- in life of petitioners, has been sought. 4. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No. 47 of 2020, under Section 494, 504, 323 of I.P.C., Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Etah, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 10, 2025 Anjali Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Kumar Yadav, Shiv Bhushan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt. Manju And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANJALI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad