HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11477 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "i. Issue an order or direction to direct the trial court to decide the interim injunction application No.6-C dated 12.01.2023 under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 which is pending before Civil Judge (Junior Division) Basti, in Civil Suit No.68 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. UPBS060000892023) (Reema Vs. Smt. Kumari and Others), within stipulated time." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2023 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Basti to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 22, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Smt. Kumari And Another .....Petitioner(s) Reema And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad