Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:21780
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 31 of 2018 Vyas Pathak S/o Shri Kanti Kumar Pathak Aged About 38 Years R/o Behind Subhash Stadium, Ahmad Ji Colony, Civil Line, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
... Appellant/Complainant versus Ramesh Borghare S/o Shri Madukar Borghare Aged About 38 Years R/o House No. 24/3, Pandari Tarai, Behind Saw Mill, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh,
... Respondent For Appellant : None. For Respondent : None
(HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL) Order on Board 09/05/2025
1. On 28.03.2025, when the matter was called there was no representation on either side and even today, no one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the appellant when the matter is called repeatedly.
2. Since there is no representation on behalf of the appellant when the matter is called repeatedly, therefore, no other option is left but to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. Sd/-
(Radhakishan Agrawal)
JUDGE Anjani
Digitally signed by ANJANI KUMAR ALLENA Date: 2025.05.09 19:02:46 +0530