110 CRWP-9153-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9153-2025 Date of decision: 25.08.2025 NAVEEN MISHRA ….Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Parunjeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. ..… RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to the official respondents and take action on their representation (Annexure P-4). 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has filed a representation (Annexure P-4) before the Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana raising its grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He has further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2-The Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take necessary action thereon. Puneet Sharma 2025.08.25 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment 110 CRWP-9153-2025 -2- 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner within a period of 30 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. 6. Disposed of. (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 25.08.2025 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Puneet Sharma 2025.08.25 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment