[2025:RJ-JP:9580] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2996/2025 Arjunlal Yadav S/o Shivnarayan Yadav, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Sundarpura, Police Station Renwal, District Jaipur Gramin (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3084/2025 Kamlesh Kumawat S/o Omprakash Kumawat, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Infront Of J.D. Hospital Hanuman Nagar Ringas Sikar Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Yadav Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Akshay Kumar, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 03/03/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.229/2024 registered at Police Station Ranpur, District Kota City for the offences under Section 318(4) & 316(2) of BNS. Investigation is being conducted for offences punishable under Sections 318(2) & 316(2) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:9580] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2996/2025] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that there is money dispute between the parties and the same has been resolved amicably. It is submitted that petitioners have no criminal antecedents and they are in custody since his date of arrest. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably; petitioners have no criminal antecedents, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 7. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners (1) Arjunlal Yadav S/o Shivnarayan Yadav, & (2) Kamlesh Kumawat S/o Omprakash Kumawat, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to [2025:RJ-JP:9580] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2996/2025] the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /419-420