SMT. SIMARAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/31309/2025 · 2025-09-09
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93504 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 93504 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31309 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents.
2. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital/live- in life of petitioners, has been sought.
3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No. 349 of 2025, under Section 87 of BNS, Police Station- Etmadpur, District- Agra, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 10, 2025 Anjali Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt. Simaran And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANJALI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad