HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30659 of 2025 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. List revised. None appears on behalf of the informant. 2. Heard Shri Mohd Sarwar Khan, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Navin Singh, learned counsel for the first informant and Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State-Respondent and perused the record. 3. This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Vineet Kumar Singh, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 76 of 2025, under Sections 103(1), 238, 61(2), 191(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station- Sarpataha, District- Jaunpur. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 13.04.2025. The applicant has no criminal antecedent to his credit and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. It is further submitted that the co-accused Vineet Kumar Singh and Shivam Yadav have been granted bail by the Court vide order dated 28.08.2025 and 23.08.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 26303 of 2025 and 27293 of 2025 respectively, therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail. 5. Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but does not dispute that similarly circumstanced aforesaid co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd Sarwar Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Navin Singh, Ranjana Singh Manoj Bind .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Through Its Secretary Home Department Lucknow. U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the accused-applicant, Manoj Bind, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: a. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. b. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. c. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. d. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. 9. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. September 17, 2025 pks BAIL No. 30659 of 2025 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- PAWAN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad