SHAYAM SINGH S/O SHRI PREM SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3063/2025 · 2025-03-17
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9350 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9350 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:11858] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3063/2025 Shayam Singh S/o Shri Prem Singh, R/o Kumheri, Police Station Saipau, District Dholpur (Rajasthan) (Accused Is Confined Under Judicial Custody At District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Avasthi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shriram Dhakar, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 17/03/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.66/2025 registered at Police Station Saipau, District Dholpur for the offences punishable under Section 19/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case.
Learned counsel submits that it has been alleged against the petitioner that he was found in possession of 15 liters of country made liquor. It is submitted that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate. Learned counsel contends that petitioner is in custody since 16.02.2025. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion.
[2025:RJ-JP:11858] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3063/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor oppose the submissions made by
learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that petitioner is a habitual offender as four other cases of similar nature have been registered against him.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, as also considering the quantity of liquor which is alleged to be recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the fact that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Shayam Singh S/o Shri Prem Singh, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded.
8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording
[2025:RJ-JP:11858] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3063/2025] the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.
9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /207