Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31383 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the UP Ziladhikari, Tehsil Handia, District- Prayagraj to get implement the order dated 16.07.2025 passed on the application of petitioner dated 16.07.2025 and demarcate the land of petitioner."
2. One Raj Nath, respondent no.3 had initiated proceedings under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and filed an application dated 24.05.2022 before Sub Divisional Officer, Handia, Prayagraj. On 27.05.2022, the Sub Divisional Officer directed the Tehsildar, Handia for measuring the land and submitting report and also directed the revenue inspector to demarcate the land and submit report. Pursuant to the said order, a report was submitted by the revenue inspector on 04.01.2023. The report of revenue inspector was accepted and the proceedings were allowed under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 by order dated 25.05.2023. 3. On 08.08.2023, petitioner filed a restoration application under Section 209(h) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for recalling the order dated
25.05.2023. The said restoration application was allowed on 12.01.2024, and the case was restored to its original number. 4. Against the said order, respondent no.3- Raj Nath filed an appeal under Section 24(4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 which was dismissed on
04.02.2025. Post dismissal of the appeal, the case was taken up by the Sub Divisional Officer and he has dismissed the case in absence of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Raksha Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dan Bahadur .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
respondent no.3. 5. An application was made by the petitioner for correcting the name in the order dated 03.06.2025. A request was made by the petitioner to implement the order dated 25.05.2023 and demarcate the land. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued for demarcating the land and implementing the order dated 16.07.2025. 6. This Court finds that once the proceedings for demarcation initiated by respondent no.3 were dismissed for want of prosecution, how can the order be carried out? At present there are no demarcation proceedings pending, as the proceedings initiated by respondent no.3 were dismissed for want of prosecution. 7. No case for interference is made out. 8.
Writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. September 10, 2025 SK Goswami WRIC No. 31383 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad