COCP No.3586 of 202 IN TH 124 ARPIT KUMAR Vs SH. T. L. SATYA CORAM: HON' Present: Mr. Mr. S for th Mr. A HARKESH MAN 1. Repl Country Planning Registry is taken 2. Lear the contempt pro does not press th remedies, as per l 3. Dism 4. Rule January 15, 202 Atik Whe Whe 2023 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De MAR AND OTHERS ATYAPRAKASH AND ANOTHER ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. M.B. Rajwade, Advocate for Mr. Sangram Singh Saron, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arun Beniwal, Sr. D.A.G., Harya **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Reply by way of affidavit of Sh. A anning, Haryana on behalf of respo taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners pt proceedings have been sought, sta ress the present petition, however, s s per law. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stands discharged. (HA , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/N Whether reportable Yes/N UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.3586 of 2023 (O&M) of Decision: 15.01.2025 ......Petitioners HER ....Respondents ESH MANUJA vocate , Haryana. Sh. Amit Khatri, Director, Town an respondent No.2 already filed in th oners submits that the order qua whic ht, stand complied with, therefore, h ver, seeks liberty to avail appropria (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 wn and in the a which fore, he ropriate MOHMED ATIK 2025.01.17 13:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment