Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9348 (RAJ)

RAM KARAN SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

CW/16151/2009 · 2025-09-15

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:37308] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16151/2009 1- Ram Karan Singh S/o Harsa Ram (since deceased), through his following Lrs:- 1/1 Babu Lal S/o Late Shri Ramkaran Singh, aged about 40 years. 1/2 Sahiram S/o Late Shri Ramkaran Singh, aged about 36 years. 1/3 Vinod Kumar S/o Late Shri Ramkaran Singh, aged about 32 years. 1/4 Jadai Devi W/o Late Shri Ramkaran Singh, aged about 65 years. All are residents of Ward No.2, Bijarnia Ki Dhani, Post Hukumpura Via Titanwas, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu Rajasthan. 1/5 Sarita daughter of Late Shri Ramkaran Singh, W/o Shri Krishan Kumar, aged about 26 years, R/o Dalelpura, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Union of India through Home Secretary, Govt. Of India, New Delhi 2. Home Secretary, Orisa, Secretariat, Cuttack 3. Inspector General, Orisa Police, Cuttack 4. Deputy Inspector General, Orisa Police, Cuttack 5. The Orisa Fire Officer, Cuttack ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki, Adv. with Mr. Ankit Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Kamwar, Adv. with Mr. Vaibhav Nirmal, Adv. & Mr. Shubham Rohila, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 15/09/2025 1. Both the learned counsels are in agreement that cause of action for filing the instant writ petition accrue for the State of Orissa and are not in the territory of State of Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:37308] (2 of 2) [CW-16151/2009] 2. Hence, in view of the above statement, on account of lack of territorial jurisdiction, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is, hereby, dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition before the appropriate Court. (ANAND SHARMA),J Daksh/Jatin/20