Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93473 (ALL)

RAVI PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/34332/2025 · 2025-09-16

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 34332 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State. 2. The present application has been filed for seeking quashing of charge- sheet dated 28.09.2022 along with cognizance/summoning order dated 10.11.2022 and the entire proceeding of Case No.1133 of 2022 (State Vs. Vinay Kumar and others), arising out of Case Crime No.509 of 2022, under sections 3/4 Public Gambling Act, P.S. Dibai, District- Bulandshahr, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Anoopshahr, Bulandshahr. 3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and charge- sheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with charge-sheet and entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicant submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicant surrenders before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail, his bail application shall be considered and decided Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nitin Kumar Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravi Prakash .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825). 7. However, it is made clear that till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicant herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. September 17, 2025 Saif NA528 No. 34332 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad