[2025:RJ-JP:20387] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR (1) S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.3068/2025 Rajendra S/o Girraj, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Rijoda, Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk (Rajasthan) (Accused/petitioner In District Jail Tonk) ----Accused/Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With (2) S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.3102/2025 1. Himmatram S/o Mastram, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Rijoda, Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk (Rajasthan) (At Present In District Jail, Tonk). 2. Vikram @ Vikki S/o Nandpal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Rijoda, Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk (Rajasthan) (At Present In District Jail, Tonk). 3. Dilkhush S/o Nandpal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Rijoda, Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk (Rajasthan) (At Present In District Jail, Tonk). ----Accused/Applicants Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicants : Mr. Aniket Sharma, Adv. Mr. Umesh Dixit, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. [2025:RJ-JP:20387] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-3068/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 14/05/2025 1. As these bail applications have been filed pertaining to the same FIR, they are being heard and decided by the instant common order. 2. These bail applications have been filed by the accused- applicants under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.146/2025 arising out of FIR No.23/2025, registered at Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk for the offences punishable under Sections 61(2)(a), 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 66-C and 66-D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 by which the bail application of the accused-applicants under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 has been dismissed. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that the accused-applicants have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants also submits that the charges levelled against the accused-applicants are triable by Judicial Magistrate First Class. Learned counsel further submits that the accused-applicants are behind the bars since 07.02.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants contends that the charge-sheet has already been filed and trial will take long time to conclude. Learned counsel also contends that there is no private complainant in this matter, therefore, the accused-applicants be granted benefit of bail. [2025:RJ-JP:20387] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-3068/2025] 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate vehemently opposes these bail applications and submits that the matter pertains to commission of cyber fraud by the accused-applicants, therefore, the accused-applicants should not be enlarged on bail. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case; the period of custody of the accused-applicants and that the trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow these bail applications filed by the applicants. 8. Consequently, these bail applications filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 are allowed. It is ordered that accused- applicants namely (1) Rajedra S/o Girraj, (2) Himmatram S/o Mastram, (3) Vikram @ Vikki S/o Nandpal & (4) Dilkhush S/o Nandpal, arrested in connection with FIR No.23/2025, registered at Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Applicants will be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 9. The accused-applicants are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the accused-applicants to learned trial Court every month. In case of any breach to the [2025:RJ-JP:20387] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-3068/2025] above condition, learned Additional Government Advocate shall be free to move the application against the accused-applicants for cancellation of bail before the concerned Magistrate. 10. Copy of this order also be sent to the concerned SHO for compliance. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /260-261 S.