Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Second Bail Application No.222 of 2023 Rahul Sharma
….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, Deputy Advocate General for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.356 of 2021, dated 14.09.2021, under Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC, Police Station SIDCUL, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. It is second bail application of the applicant. His first bail application has already been rejected on 07.01.2023.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that there is no new ground to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the second bail application of the applicant deserves to be rejected.
2
4.
The second bail application is rejected.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
26.06.2025 Sanjay SANJAY KANOJIA Digitally signed by SANJAY KANOJIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=e50e50b49596520698eff87e0a08bbd5046 86df4d1afc60f54a287831dec46fe, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26EEB7122ED0DD23233A255DD8EC 450A84B515A087CAEFD1B3179A7DEAE40699, cn=SANJAY KANOJIA Date: 2025.06.26 18:21:00 +05'30'