Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 93432 (ALL)

BADRI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/31316/2025 · 2025-09-09

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 31316 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel as to the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that the order impugned is an appealable order under Section 67 (5) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 2. In view of the said fact, no writ petition lies under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 3. Writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. However, it is open to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appellate authority within 15 days from today and, in case, the said appeal is filed within the period mentioned above, the appellate authority shall not go into the question of limitation and decide the same strictly in accordance with law. September 10, 2025 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mani Ram Verma, Santosh Kumar Chaubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Badri .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad