[2025:RJ-JP:10368] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3127/2025 Guddi Bai @ Gayatri Bai W/o Shri Jagdish Chandra, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Sorsan Ki Jhopdiya, P.s. Anta Tehsil Anta District Baran. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/03/2025 1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS filed on behalf of the petitioner, who is having apprehension of arrest in F.I.R. No.418/2023 registered at Police Station Anta, District Baran (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 308 & 143 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that cross-cases have been registered between the parties. Counsel submit that in cross-case, police filed charge- sheet against the complainant party for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 323, 341, 504, 324, 326, 147, 148 & 149 of IPC, Sections 3(1)(s) & 3(2)(va) of SC/ST act and Section 25(1B) (i) & 3/25 of Arms Act. Counsel submits that other co-accused persons namely Hemraj, Raghuvir Singh, Mukesh Kumar, [2025:RJ-JP:10368] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3127/2025] Durgashankar & Ramkailash have been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 28.01.2025. Counsel submits that there is omnibus allegations against the petitioner. Counsel submits that petitioner is female and there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Custodial interrogation of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned State Counsel opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that cross-cases have been registered between the parties; petitioner is a female; absence of criminal antecedents of the petitioner; other co-accused persons have been granted regular bail by this Court, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Anta, District Baran (Rajasthan) in F.I.R. No.418/2023 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Guddi Bai @ Gayatri Bai W/o Shri Jagdish Chandra, she shall be released on bail, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- [2025:RJ-JP:10368] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3127/2025] (i) that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /30