Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11489 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief:
"(I) Direct the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Naugarh, Siddharth Nagar to decide the O.S. No.473 of 2022 (Sunita and others Vs. Ram Milan and others) within stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (7C2 Application) is pending since 2022 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously.
4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending.
5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Naugarh, Siddharth Nagar to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (7C2 Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment.
September 22, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surendra Mohan Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Sunita .....Petitioner(s) Rammilan And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad